Big Updates Coming. We're preparing major updates to our UDO research and proposal. Some details on these pages may change soon.

Overland Park Is Rewriting Its Zoning Code

The city is consolidating 33 zoning districts into 11. The decisions made now will shape housing options, affordability, and neighborhood life for a generation.

New Homes Each Year

The city is building fewer than half the housing units it needs annually.

Homes a Working Family Can Afford

1home since 2021

Only one home has been built at the price point needed by the average workforce family.

Homes for Sale

0.6%vacant
0%Healthy: 5%

Owner-occupied vacancy is a fraction of the 5% a healthy market needs.

Households That Rent

~40%

About 4 in 10 Overland Park households rent, and zoning rules fall hardest on them.

The City's Own Data Makes the Case

The January 2026 Housing Needs Assessment, presented by city staff, establishes the factual foundation:

FrameworkOP's Housing Goal calls for "vibrant neighborhoods with a variety of housing types that offer attractive, attainable, and safe housing options." The Housing Needs Assessment numbers above show the city is not on track to meet that goal.

See the data →

The Market Study Says One Thing, the Code Draft Says Another

The city's own market study names parking costs as a barrier to walkable development, yet the code outline would carry today's parking rules forward.

Read our analysis →

Where the New Districts Help

Fewer, simpler districts, a first step toward duplexes, cottages, and townhomes in today's single-family neighborhoods, and room for tired shopping centers to become mixed-use.

Read our analysis →

Where the Critical Details Are Missing

Childcare, what "supported" really means, and how much staff can approve on their own are still open, and each one decides whether the new rules get used.

Read our analysis →

What This Means for Renters

Protecting older apartments, ending the four-unrelated-people cap, and tying zoning to rental quality matter most to the people who rent here.

Read our analysis →

The State Legislature Adds Urgency

SB 391 would bar cities from requiring landlords to accept housing vouchers, which makes the local zoning code even more important.

Read our analysis →

Our Proposal

Our proposal is organized around three key areas that align the UDO with the city's adopted vision, using objective, predictable standards.

Or view printer-friendly proposal

Housing Variety

Permit duplexes, townhomes, and cottage courts by-right. Legalize ADUs citywide. Reduce minimum lot sizes to make starter homes and infill development feasible.

FrameworkOP: P-LU.5, A-H.5, A-H.6

Affordability

Eliminate parking minimums in walkable areas. Modernize occupancy rules to focus on health and safety, not an outdated definition of "family" that restricts how people live.

FrameworkOP: P-LU.4, A-LU.1.B, A-LU.1.C

Neighborhood Life

Allow small-scale, neighborhood-serving shops with design standards. Require new developments to include functional common spaces like plazas, courtyards, and pocket parks.

FrameworkOP: P-LU.9, A-QOL.2

What to Do Next

The UDO rewrite is happening right now, and the rules are changing.

  1. 1

    Contact Your Council Members

    Tell your council members you support eliminating parking minimums, allowing neighborhood commercial, and permitting duplexes by-right.

    Find Your Council Members →
  2. 2

    Read Our Proposal

    See what we're asking for, and ask the city how "supported" uses will actually be approved.

    Read the Proposal →

Our Proposal Is a Public Resource

Our structured proposal is a public resource for the residents of Overland Park. It is grounded in the city's own adopted plans and supported by publicly available data. Have questions or want to share feedback? We'd like to hear from you.

UDO Rewrite Timeline

The city's UDO rewrite is a multi-phase process spanning from Winter 2024 through Fall/Winter 2026. Public hearings and workshops are key moments for resident input.

Unified Development Ordinance Update Timeline showing 8 phases from Winter 2024-2025 through Fall/Winter 2026, including code audit, market studies, drafting, public hearings, and final adoption.
Source: City of Overland Park Planning & Development Services

Sources & Research

City of Overland Park Adopted Plans
City of Overland Park, Adopted 2024
The city's adopted comprehensive plan. Key housing policies: P-LU.5 (Increase Housing Choices), P-H.1 (Variety of Housing Types), P-LU.9 (Complete Neighborhoods).
2026 Strategic Goals
City of Overland Park, 2026
Directs the city to evaluate options for incentivizing diverse and attainable housing, revise regulatory standards to encourage missing middle housing, and remove barriers to infill lots.
Overland Park Housing Data
OP Strategic Planning (Erin Ollig), January 2026
OP needs ~1,420 units/yr through 2030; averaging <700 built; only 1 home at attainable price since 2021.
Johnson County Post, January 2026
United Community Services of Johnson County, 2021
OP Planning & Development Services, December 2024
61.5% owner / 38.5% renter; 29,420 population increase by 2030; voucher waitlist ~500 families.
Redfin, January 2026
RentCafe / Yardi Matrix, December 2025
Point2Homes (ACS), 2023
United Community Services, January 2024
UDO Draft Documents (March 2026)
RCLCO Real Estate Advisors, March 2026
Data-driven demand projections through 2050 calling for parking reform and more homes per acre.
City of Overland Park / Consultant, March 2026
Guiding Principles + District Summaries
Distributed at March 12 open house
City of Overland Park / Consultant, March 2026
City of Overland Park / Consultant, March 2026
The only district with actual dimensional standards released, showing the new "tier" approach.
Market Study Alignment Memo
Distributed at March 12 open house
Portfolio Homes Pilot
Distributed at March 12 open house
Comparable City Reforms
City of Lawrence, November 2024
Nearest Kansas precedent: missing middle in all residential zones, parking minimums eliminated. Effective April 2025.
Better Cities Project / Unified Government, July 2025
Pew Charitable Trusts, January 2024
Sightline Institute, April 2024
The Urbanist, November 2023
Sightline Institute, June 2025
Arlington Magazine, 2025
Kansas City, MO, 2022–23
Parking & Cost Research
VTPI / Todd Litman, December 2025
Definitive suburban cost analysis: 1 space = +12.5% dev cost; suburban land adds ~$8K/space.
Local Housing Solutions (Furman Center / NLC), 2024
Strong Towns / Urban3, 2020
Kansas City-specific analysis: mixed-use yields 10x the tax revenue per acre vs. auto-oriented development.
American Planning Association, October 2018
U.S. Department of Transportation, January 2025
Legal & Policy
Kansas Legislature, 2025–26 Session
Passed Senate 31-7. Would block cities from requiring landlords to accept housing vouchers.
Oregon Legislature, 2021 (via Reason / AEI)
Metropolitan Abundance Project, 2024

Privacy Policy

Last updated: October 14, 2026

Overland Park Voice ("we") runs opvoice.org. This explains what the site collects and why.

Information We Collect

We collect as little as we can. We don't use cookies, ad trackers, or tracking pixels, and we don't build profiles of visitors. The only personal information we get is what you choose to send us.

Sign-Up Form

If you use the sign-up form on our site, we receive:

  • Your name
  • Your email address
  • Your message, if you add one

We use these only to reply to you and to send the updates you asked for.

Site Analytics

We count visits with GoatCounter, an open-source analytics service built for privacy. It's fully anonymized. It records which page was viewed, the referring site, your browser and screen size, and your country. It doesn't use cookies or store your IP address, and it can't identify you or follow you across other sites. We use these counts only to see which pages people read.

Our Web Host

Like any website, our host keeps standard server logs under its own policy. We don't use them to identify visitors.

How We Use Information

  • Replying to you: we use what you send through the form to answer you.
  • Improving the site: anonymous visit counts tell us what's useful and what's broken.

We never sell, rent, or share your personal information for marketing.

Third-Party Services

  • GoatCounter (gc.zgo.at): the anonymized visit counts described above.
  • Formspree (formspree.io): handles the sign-up form and forwards submissions to our email. We don't store form data on the website.
  • Google Fonts (fonts.googleapis.com): serves the site's typeface. Your browser contacts Google to load it.
  • Tailwind CSS (cdn.tailwindcss.com): serves the site's styling.
  • Chart.js (cdn.jsdelivr.net): draws the charts on our housing research page.

Social Media

We link to our accounts on Facebook, Instagram (@op.voice), Reddit (r/OverlandParkVoice) and YouTube (@VOICEofOP). Those platforms have their own privacy practices, which we don't control.

Data Security

The site uses HTTPS encryption, and form submissions go to Formspree's secure servers. No method of sending data over the internet is completely secure, but we keep what we hold to a minimum.

Data Retention

  • Form messages: we delete them when they're no longer needed to reply to you or send the updates you asked for.
  • Visit counts: kept as anonymous totals.

Your Rights

You can ask what personal information we hold about you, and ask us to correct it, delete it, or stop contacting you. Email us and we'll take care of it.

Contact Us

  • Email: overlandpark.voice@gmail.com

We aim to reply within 5 business days.

OP Voice Transparency

AI Use Policy

How We Use AI in Our Research and Writing

Updated: October 2026

Scope: All OP Voice research, policy drafting, and community projects

Objective: Ensuring human judgment remains the foundation of civic advocacy

Part I

Why This Exists

As a one-person organization juggling a full-time job and serious policy work, efficiency is a necessity. However, if we demand transparency from the City on their AI use, we owe you the same.

Core Principles:

  • 1.
    Authenticity Over Polish: AI helps me be more thorough, but it never replaces the reading or the judgment.
  • 2.
    Transparency as Default: If AI contributed significantly to a piece of work, we disclose it.
  • 3.
    Human-in-the-Loop: AI can surface patterns, but humans make the call on what matters.

Part II

How the Work Actually Happens

Step 1: Human Research & Analysis

Every project starts with reading actual documents: city contracts, vendor policies, ordinances, and investigative reporting. I form my own hypotheses and arguments from this research foundation. AI never sees a blank slate; it sees work I've already started.

Step 2: Using AI to Cover Gaps

AI tools are used to find sources I might have missed, identify logical holes, and synthesize patterns across multiple documents. All AI-surfaced sources get verified independently. We use multiple AI systems to avoid vendor lock-in.

Step 3: Red-Teaming & Stress-Testing

Before committing to a position publicly, I use AI to find the strongest counter-arguments. This helps identify vulnerabilities before they reach the City Attorney or Council. If red-teaming reveals a weak position, I change or abandon it.

Part III

The Red-Teaming Practice

Red-teaming is the most valuable way I use AI. It's brutally honest feedback without social pressure.

The Red-Team Protocol: What We Ask

"What's the strongest case against this?"

Finding the counter-perspectives early.

"What am I assuming that I shouldn't?"

Exposing blind spots in our logic.

"Where is this most vulnerable to criticism?"

Strengthening the evidentiary base.

"How would city staff oppose this?"

Preparing for the real-world debate.

Part IV

Verification & Disclosure

Section 1: The Human Verification Standard

This mirrors our February 2026 RTIC governance proposal. Just as OPPD shouldn't take enforcement action based solely on an AI alert, OP Voice doesn't publish AI analysis without human verification.

Claims verified vs original sources
Tested against lived experience
Judgment on community needs
Tone edited for authenticity

Section 2: Clear Disclosure Requirements

Disclosure is required for research posts where AI helped find sources, policy documents with AI assisted structure, or any content where AI contribution was substantial.

"Research conducted by OP Voice, gaps filled and verified with AI assistance. Draft organized with AI tools, substantially edited for accuracy and voice."

Part V

Accountability When AI Gets It Wrong

No verification process is perfect. If AI-assisted research leads to an error in published work, our response is human-centered:

Public Correction

We correct it with the same visibility as the original post, explaining what went wrong (bad source, flawed synthesis, verification gap).

Human Accountability

We don't hide behind "the AI got it wrong." The human verified it. The human published it. The accountability is 100% human.

What This Means for Readers

When you read an OP Voice research post, the sourcing is real. I've read the contracts, the ordinances, and the vendor policies myself.

Where AI shows up is in the gaps: flagging a case I hadn't found, catching a logical inconsistency, or helping organize 30 pages of research into something readable. The positions, the framing, and the decision to publish are mine.

If something seems off or you want to see the underlying sources, ask. That's the whole point.

This policy is a living document, evolved through community feedback and technical changes.

© 2026 Overland Park Voice

Visit opvoice.org for more information